do Broadbanddo Music   |  do Movies   |  do Gaming   |  do Chat   |  do Stuff

Ubisoft Needs More Consoles



Ubisoft CEO, Yves Guillemot has said that Ubisoft needs more consoles as a long life-cycle is bad for the industry.

In an interview with Polygon, Guillemot said that consoles are taking too long to change and it’s bad for the industry as a whole.

"I think that what has happened is the transition has been very long. You know, in the industry, we were used to changing machines every five years. This time we are in the seventh year of the 360. We need new consoles and at the end of the cycle generally the market goes down because there are less new IPs, new properties, so that damaged the industry a little bit,” he said.

Perhaps he does make a valid point because any PC owner will know that changing your PC or upgrading it at least is something that is generally done on a three-year cycle. Some companies actually offer new laptops to employees on a two year cycle, given how fast the technology moves. Is it really so brutal to ask for a new console cycle every five years?

Guillemot said in the interview that the transition between console cycles is the best time in the industry because it drives everyone to take more risks and do things differently.

"When a console is out for a long time ... you don't take as much risks on totally new IPs because even if they are good, they don't sell as well,” he said.

He went on to say that everyone who is taking risks and innovating at the moment is welcome because there are a lot of hardcore gamers who want new things. The mass market will be more interested in having the same experience and it means that the beginning of a machines development cycle is always good for innovation.

Check out the full interview with Guillemot here.



Article Comments
nAv | Shadow
Committee Member
Posts: 319
Clan: nAv Gaming
Mon, 26 Nov 2012, 2:04 pm
PC....enough said
DaMoose
VIP Troll
Posts: 1010
Tue, 27 Nov 2012, 12:04 am
Agreed. Less consoles the better. Everyone, urinate in every console you see
Infictus
Junior Troll
Posts: 146
Tue, 27 Nov 2012, 12:57 am
LMAO! I think it's pointless to create games for consoles, yes games play "nicely", but only to console owners... But having to code and create games for only a specific machine kind of prevents developers and programmers to create innovative software because consoles are limited the day it is fabricated... Now a PC on the other hand, can constantly be upgraded til you are blue in the face... and developers aren't left wanting when it comes to PC technology... So, until the day Microsoft, Nintendo, Sony or any other Console developer creates a console that I can upgrade, modify or over-clock... I'm sticking to my PC! And this is no argument.. it's fact.
jennibatman
Posts: 31
Tue, 27 Nov 2012, 2:53 pm
Interesting that Guillemot says this, because Take Two CEO Strauss Zelnick says there's lots to do with the current consoles. Zelnick believes there's lots of opportunity.
DaMoose
VIP Troll
Posts: 1010
Tue, 27 Nov 2012, 5:59 pm
"Opportunity", means economic opportunity, not innovative or development opportunity.
ChristianLot3r
Senior Troll
Posts: 371
Wed, 28 Nov 2012, 11:02 pm
I prefer pc over console but honestly some games are just better on console ......But Agree console tec is way behind


Please Register or Login to submit a new comment.

Competitions